Australia vs Romania: Fertilizer application rates over the long run
Australia
54.19
in 2014
Romania
51.52
in 2014
Australia rank
101st
Romania rank
102nd
Fertilizer application rates over the long run over time
- Australia
- Romania
How they compare
Australia currently reports 54.19 against 51.52 in Romania, a difference of 2.67.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 101st and Romania ranks 102nd of 161 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.84 | 43.34 | 1.49 | Australia |
| 2010s | 48.32 | 52.84 | 4.52 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizer application rates over the long run, Australia or Romania?
- Australia, at 54.19 against 51.52 in Romania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in fertilizer application rates over the long run between Australia and Romania?
- 2.67, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Romania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Romania rank globally for fertilizer application rates over the long run?
- Australia ranks 101st and Romania ranks 102nd of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fertilizer application rates over the long run. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.