Australia vs Nicaragua: Fertilizer application rates over the long run
Australia
54.19
in 2014
Nicaragua
50.94
in 2014
Australia rank
101st
Nicaragua rank
104th
Fertilizer application rates over the long run over time
- Australia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Australia currently reports 54.19 against 50.94 in Nicaragua, a difference of 3.25.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 101st and Nicaragua ranks 104th of 161 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.84 | 30.91 | 13.93 | Australia |
| 2010s | 48.32 | 44.38 | 3.95 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizer application rates over the long run, Australia or Nicaragua?
- Australia, at 54.19 against 50.94 in Nicaragua as of 2014.
- What is the difference in fertilizer application rates over the long run between Australia and Nicaragua?
- 3.25, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Nicaragua?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Nicaragua rank globally for fertilizer application rates over the long run?
- Australia ranks 101st and Nicaragua ranks 104th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fertilizer application rates over the long run. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.