Australia vs Cuba: Fertilizer application rates over the long run
Australia
54.19
in 2014
Cuba
58.21
in 2014
Australia rank
101st
Cuba rank
100th
Fertilizer application rates over the long run over time
- Australia
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 58.21 against 54.19 in Australia, a difference of 4.02.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 101st and Cuba ranks 100th of 161 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.84 | 28.06 | 16.77 | Australia |
| 2010s | 48.32 | 44.12 | 4.2 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizer application rates over the long run, Australia or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 58.21 against 54.19 in Australia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in fertilizer application rates over the long run between Australia and Cuba?
- 4.02, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Cuba?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Cuba rank globally for fertilizer application rates over the long run?
- Australia ranks 101st and Cuba ranks 100th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fertilizer application rates over the long run. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.