Australia vs Botswana: Fertilizer application rates over the long run
Australia
54.19
in 2014
Botswana
58.28
in 2014
Australia rank
101st
Botswana rank
99th
Fertilizer application rates over the long run over time
- Australia
- Botswana
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 58.28 against 54.19 in Australia, a difference of 4.09.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Botswana ahead.
Australia ranks 101st and Botswana ranks 99th of 161 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.25 | 48.6 | 12.35 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 48.32 | 61.46 | 13.14 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertilizer application rates over the long run, Australia or Botswana?
- Botswana, at 58.28 against 54.19 in Australia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in fertilizer application rates over the long run between Australia and Botswana?
- 4.09, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Botswana?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Botswana rank globally for fertilizer application rates over the long run?
- Australia ranks 101st and Botswana ranks 99th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fertilizer application rates over the long run. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.