Belarus vs Republic of Korea: FDI outflows to Food, Beverages and Tobacco — Value US$
FDI outflows to Food, Beverages and Tobacco — Value US$ over time
- Belarus
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 1,248 million USD against 476.43 million USD in Belarus, a difference of 771.57 million USD.
That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 2.6 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Belarus ranks 9th and Republic of Korea ranks 6th of 40 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.68 million USD | 352.97 million USD | 347.29 million USD | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 241.6 million USD | 204.63 million USD | 36.96 million USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fdi outflows to food, beverages and tobacco — value us$, Belarus or Republic of Korea?
- Republic of Korea, at 1,248 million USD against 476.43 million USD in Belarus as of 2021.
- What is the difference in fdi outflows to food, beverages and tobacco — value us$ between Belarus and Republic of Korea?
- 771.57 million USD, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Republic of Korea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Belarus and Republic of Korea rank globally for fdi outflows to food, beverages and tobacco — value us$?
- Belarus ranks 9th and Republic of Korea ranks 6th of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FDI outflows to Food, Beverages and Tobacco — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FDI is an investment which aims to acquire a lasting management influence (10 percent or more of the voting stock) in an enterprise operating in a foreign economy. FDI may be undertaken by individuals, as well as business entities. The foreign direct investor most often is aiming to gain access to natural resources, to markets, to labour supply, to technology, to ensure security of supplies or to control the quality of a certain product. FDI can be decomposed into two types of investments: mergers and acquisitions (MA) and greenfield investments. The latter type results in the creation of new entities and the setting up of offices, buildings, plants or factories from scratch in a foreign economy. FDI is the sum of equity capital, reinvested earnings and other FDI capital. Equity capital comprises equity in branches, all shares in subsidiaries and associates (except non-participating, preferred shares that are treated as debt securities and are included under other FDI capital) and other contributions such as the provision of machinery. Reinvested earnings consist of the direct investor's share (in proportion to equity participation) of earnings not distributed by the direct investment enterprise. Other FDI capital (loans) includes the borrowing and lending of funds, including debt securities and trade credits between direct investors and direct investment enterprises. FDI inflows and outflows are important for tracking the direct investment conditions each year. Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions from the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises resident abroad. Whereas, Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions received by the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises of a specific industry resident in the reporting economy.