Romania vs Southern Africa: Fats, Animals, Raw — Processing

Romania
23 1000 t
in 2023
Southern Africa
17 1000 t
in 2023
Romania rank
7th
Southern Africa rank
9th

Fats, Animals, Raw — Processing over time

  • Romania
  • Southern Africa
10152025201020162023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 23 1000 t against 17 1000 t in Southern Africa, a difference of 6 1000 t.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.4 times Southern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Southern Africa ahead.

Romania ranks 7th and Southern Africa ranks 9th of 32 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Southern Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Southern Africa Difference Ahead
2010s 9.33 1000 t 11 1000 t 1.67 1000 t Southern Africa
2020s 22.5 1000 t 17.25 1000 t 5.25 1000 t Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fats, animals, raw — processing, Romania or Southern Africa?
Romania, at 23 1000 t against 17 1000 t in Southern Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in fats, animals, raw — processing between Romania and Southern Africa?
6 1000 t, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Southern Africa?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Romania and Southern Africa rank globally for fats, animals, raw — processing?
Romania ranks 7th and Southern Africa ranks 9th of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fats, Animals, Raw — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Southern Africa: Fats, Animals, Raw — Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fats-animals-raw-processing/romania/southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fats-animals-raw-processing/romania/southern-africa/">Romania vs Southern Africa: Fats, Animals, Raw — Processing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fats, Animals, Raw — Processing
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
54 places, 712 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.