Chile vs Lithuania: Fat of pigs — Production, per capita
Chile
0.0013 t per person
in 2024
Lithuania
0.0015 t per person
in 2017
Chile rank
23rd
Lithuania rank
21st
Fat of pigs — Production, per capita over time
- Chile
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.0015 t per person against 0.0013 t per person in Chile, a difference of 0.0002 t per person.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Chile ranks 23rd and Lithuania ranks 21st of 150 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0016 t per person | 0.001 t per person | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.0011 t per person | 0.0016 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.0013 t per person | 0.0016 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fat of pigs — production, per capita, Chile or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 0.0015 t per person against 0.0013 t per person in Chile as of 2017.
- What is the difference in fat of pigs — production, per capita between Chile and Lithuania?
- 0.0002 t per person, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lithuania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Lithuania rank globally for fat of pigs — production, per capita?
- Chile ranks 23rd and Lithuania ranks 21st of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fat of pigs — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fat of pigs — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.