Türkiye vs United Republic of Tanzania: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value

Türkiye
5,006 1000 No
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
5,134 1000 No
in 2023
Türkiye rank
6th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
5th

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value over time

  • Türkiye
  • United Republic of Tanzania
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k200020112023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 5,134 1000 No against 5,006 1000 No in Türkiye, a difference of 128 1000 No.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Türkiye ahead.

Türkiye ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 15 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Türkiye averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Türkiye United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 3,838 1000 No 1,875 1000 No 1,963 1000 No Türkiye
2010s 4,450 1000 No 3,313 1000 No 1,137 1000 No Türkiye
2020s 4,733 1000 No 4,841 1000 No 107.89 1000 No United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value, Türkiye or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 5,134 1000 No against 5,006 1000 No in Türkiye as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value between Türkiye and United Republic of Tanzania?
128 1000 No, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Türkiye and United Republic of Tanzania?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Türkiye and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value?
Türkiye ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 15 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Türkiye vs United Republic of Tanzania: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-value/turkiye-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-value/turkiye-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Türkiye vs United Republic of Tanzania: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 4,118 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.