Tajikistan vs Palestine, State of: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value

Tajikistan
97.83 1000 No
in 2022
Palestine, State of
124.25 1000 No
in 2022
Tajikistan rank
104th
Palestine, State of rank
101st

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value over time

  • Tajikistan
  • Palestine, State of
50100150200250300200020112022

How they compare

Palestine, State of currently reports 124.25 1000 No against 97.83 1000 No in Tajikistan, a difference of 26.42 1000 No.

That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 1.3 times Tajikistan's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Palestine, State of ahead.

Tajikistan ranks 104th and Palestine, State of ranks 101st of 137 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Tajikistan averaged higher in 1 and Palestine, State of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tajikistan Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
2000s 60.77 1000 No 61.57 1000 No 0.798 1000 No Palestine, State of
2010s 96.97 1000 No 82.95 1000 No 14.01 1000 No Tajikistan
2020s 92.05 1000 No 105.75 1000 No 13.7 1000 No Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value, Tajikistan or Palestine, State of?
Palestine, State of, at 124.25 1000 No against 97.83 1000 No in Tajikistan as of 2022.
What is the difference in fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value between Tajikistan and Palestine, State of?
26.42 1000 No, with Palestine, State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Palestine, State of?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Tajikistan and Palestine, State of rank globally for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value?
Tajikistan ranks 104th and Palestine, State of ranks 101st of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tajikistan vs Palestine, State of: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-value/tajikistan/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-value/tajikistan/west-bank-and-gaza/">Tajikistan vs Palestine, State of: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 4,118 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.