Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 836.07 1000 No against 760.59 1000 No in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 75.48 1000 No.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 137 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 236.53 1000 No | 403.13 1000 No | 166.6 1000 No | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 432.11 1000 No | 538.82 1000 No | 106.7 1000 No | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 714.67 1000 No | 783.68 1000 No | 69 1000 No | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 836.07 1000 No against 760.59 1000 No in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 75.48 1000 No, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.