Kiribati vs Samoa: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value

Kiribati
12.3 1000 No
in 2023
Samoa
9.27 1000 No
in 2022
Kiribati rank
123rd
Samoa rank
126th

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value over time

  • Kiribati
  • Samoa
4681012201220172023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 12.3 1000 No against 9.27 1000 No in Samoa, a difference of 3.03 1000 No.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.3 times Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Samoa ahead.

Kiribati ranks 123rd and Samoa ranks 126th of 137 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Samoa Difference Ahead
2010s 4.28 1000 No 7.35 1000 No 3.07 1000 No Samoa
2020s 8.65 1000 No 8.53 1000 No 0.1233 1000 No Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value, Kiribati or Samoa?
Kiribati, at 12.3 1000 No against 9.27 1000 No in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value between Kiribati and Samoa?
3.03 1000 No, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Samoa?
8 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
How do Kiribati and Samoa rank globally for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value?
Kiribati ranks 123rd and Samoa ranks 126th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Samoa: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-value/kiribati/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-value/kiribati/samoa/">Kiribati vs Samoa: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 4,118 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.