Botswana vs Congo: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value

Botswana
81.37 1000 No
in 2023
Congo
88.48 1000 No
in 2023
Botswana rank
109th
Congo rank
106th

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value over time

  • Botswana
  • Congo
20406080200020112023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 88.48 1000 No against 81.37 1000 No in Botswana, a difference of 7.11 1000 No.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.

Botswana ranks 109th and Congo ranks 106th of 137 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 42.9 1000 No 46.81 1000 No 3.91 1000 No Congo
2010s 61.96 1000 No 70.97 1000 No 9.01 1000 No Congo
2020s 75.39 1000 No 82.16 1000 No 6.77 1000 No Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value, Botswana or Congo?
Congo, at 88.48 1000 No against 81.37 1000 No in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value between Botswana and Congo?
7.11 1000 No, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Congo rank globally for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value?
Botswana ranks 109th and Congo ranks 106th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Congo: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-value/botswana/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-value/botswana/congo-rep/">Botswana vs Congo: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 4,118 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.