Bhutan vs Comoros: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value over time
- Bhutan
- Comoros
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 56.53 1000 No against 25.93 1000 No in Comoros, a difference of 30.6 1000 No.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 2.2 times Comoros's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 116th and Comoros ranks 119th of 137 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35 1000 No | 15.32 1000 No | 19.69 1000 No | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 47.7 1000 No | 19.03 1000 No | 28.67 1000 No | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 51.13 1000 No | 22.07 1000 No | 29.07 1000 No | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value, Bhutan or Comoros?
- Bhutan, at 56.53 1000 No against 25.93 1000 No in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value between Bhutan and Comoros?
- 30.6 1000 No, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Comoros?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Comoros rank globally for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value?
- Bhutan ranks 116th and Comoros ranks 119th of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.