Bangladesh vs Brazil: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value

Bangladesh
13,338 1000 No
in 2023
Brazil
13,147 1000 No
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
7th
Brazil rank
8th

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Brazil
05.0k10.0k15.0k200020112023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 13,338 1000 No against 13,147 1000 No in Brazil, a difference of 191 1000 No.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brazil ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 7th and Brazil ranks 8th of 137 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Brazil in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Brazil Difference Ahead
2000s 10,148 1000 No 12,741 1000 No 2,592 1000 No Brazil
2010s 12,146 1000 No 12,255 1000 No 109.63 1000 No Brazil
2020s 12,698 1000 No 12,424 1000 No 273.48 1000 No Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value, Bangladesh or Brazil?
Bangladesh, at 13,338 1000 No against 13,147 1000 No in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value between Bangladesh and Brazil?
191 1000 No, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Brazil?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Brazil rank globally for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — value?
Bangladesh ranks 7th and Brazil ranks 8th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Brazil: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-value/bangladesh/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-value/bangladesh/brazil/">Bangladesh vs Brazil: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 4,118 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.