Bangladesh vs United Republic of Tanzania: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value

Bangladesh
12,136 1000 No
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
2,454 1000 No
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
4th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value over time

  • Bangladesh
  • United Republic of Tanzania
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k200020112023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 12,136 1000 No against 2,454 1000 No in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 9,682 1000 No.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 4.9 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 125 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 9,020 1000 No 939.5 1000 No 8,080 1000 No Bangladesh
2010s 10,020 1000 No 1,537 1000 No 8,483 1000 No Bangladesh
2020s 11,305 1000 No 2,266 1000 No 9,039 1000 No Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value, Bangladesh or United Republic of Tanzania?
Bangladesh, at 12,136 1000 No against 2,454 1000 No in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value between Bangladesh and United Republic of Tanzania?
9,682 1000 No, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and United Republic of Tanzania?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — male — value?
Bangladesh ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs United Republic of Tanzania: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-male-value/bangladesh/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-male-value/bangladesh/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Bangladesh vs United Republic of Tanzania: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.