Panama vs Switzerland: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value

Panama
132.31 1000 No
in 2023
Switzerland
121.82 1000 No
in 2023
Panama rank
69th
Switzerland rank
71st

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value over time

  • Panama
  • Switzerland
5075100125150175200020112023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 132.31 1000 No against 121.82 1000 No in Switzerland, a difference of 10.49 1000 No.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Switzerland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Switzerland ahead.

Panama ranks 69th and Switzerland ranks 71st of 125 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Switzerland Difference Ahead
2000s 84.5 1000 No 144.76 1000 No 60.26 1000 No Switzerland
2010s 101.5 1000 No 144.53 1000 No 43.03 1000 No Switzerland
2020s 125.11 1000 No 120.08 1000 No 5.03 1000 No Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value, Panama or Switzerland?
Panama, at 132.31 1000 No against 121.82 1000 No in Switzerland as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value between Panama and Switzerland?
10.49 1000 No, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Switzerland?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Panama and Switzerland rank globally for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value?
Panama ranks 69th and Switzerland ranks 71st of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Switzerland: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/panama/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/panama/switzerland/">Panama vs Switzerland: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.