Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Micronesia: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
19,986 1000 No
in 2023
Micronesia
7.39 1000 No
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
11th
Micronesia rank
14th

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Micronesia
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k200020112023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 19,986 1000 No against 7.39 1000 No in Micronesia, a difference of 19,979 1000 No.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2,704.5 times Micronesia's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th and Micronesia ranks 14th of 31 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Micronesia Difference Ahead
2010s 15,992 1000 No 1.66 1000 No 15,990 1000 No Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 18,923 1000 No 3.92 1000 No 18,920 1000 No Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Micronesia?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 19,986 1000 No against 7.39 1000 No in Micronesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia?
19,979 1000 No, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia?
7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia rank globally for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th and Micronesia ranks 14th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Micronesia: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/micronesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/micronesia/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Micronesia: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.