Ecuador vs Poland: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value

Ecuador
913.34 1000 No
in 2023
Poland
915.09 1000 No
in 2023
Ecuador rank
31st
Poland rank
30th

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value over time

  • Ecuador
  • Poland
2004006008001.0k200020112023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 915.09 1000 No against 913.34 1000 No in Ecuador, a difference of 1.75 1000 No.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 31st and Poland ranks 30th of 125 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 498.81 1000 No 617.21 1000 No 118.4 1000 No Poland
2010s 694.31 1000 No 868.45 1000 No 174.14 1000 No Poland
2020s 875.65 1000 No 891.5 1000 No 15.86 1000 No Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value, Ecuador or Poland?
Poland, at 915.09 1000 No against 913.34 1000 No in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value between Ecuador and Poland?
1.75 1000 No, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Poland?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Poland rank globally for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value?
Ecuador ranks 31st and Poland ranks 30th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Poland: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/ecuador/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/ecuador/poland/">Ecuador vs Poland: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.