Jordan vs Singapore: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value

Jordan
292.16 1000 No
in 2023
Singapore
285.11 1000 No
in 2023
Jordan rank
98th
Singapore rank
100th

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value over time

  • Jordan
  • Singapore
0100200300200020112023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 292.16 1000 No against 285.11 1000 No in Singapore, a difference of 7.05 1000 No.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 98th and Singapore ranks 100th of 145 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 136.09 1000 No 3.54 1000 No 132.55 1000 No Jordan
2010s 214.88 1000 No 3.84 1000 No 211.04 1000 No Jordan
2020s 271.57 1000 No 202.56 1000 No 69 1000 No Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value, Jordan or Singapore?
Jordan, at 292.16 1000 No against 285.11 1000 No in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value between Jordan and Singapore?
7.05 1000 No, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Singapore?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Singapore rank globally for fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value?
Jordan ranks 98th and Singapore ranks 100th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Singapore: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-value/jordan/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-value/jordan/singapore/">Jordan vs Singapore: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 4,476 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.