Ghana vs Peru: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value
FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value over time
- Ghana
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 8,256 1000 No against 7,289 1000 No in Ghana, a difference of 967 1000 No.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 21st of 145 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,375 1000 No | 6,761 1000 No | 613.47 1000 No | Ghana |
| 2010s | 7,741 1000 No | 7,673 1000 No | 68.63 1000 No | Ghana |
| 2020s | 7,187 1000 No | 8,348 1000 No | 1,161 1000 No | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value, Ghana or Peru?
- Peru, at 8,256 1000 No against 7,289 1000 No in Ghana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value between Ghana and Peru?
- 967 1000 No, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Peru?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and Peru rank globally for fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value?
- Ghana ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 21st of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.