Eswatini vs Mauritius: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value
FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value over time
- Eswatini
- Mauritius
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 96.24 1000 No against 90.69 1000 No in Mauritius, a difference of 5.55 1000 No.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mauritius ahead.
Eswatini ranks 116th and Mauritius ranks 117th of 145 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.03 1000 No | 139.53 1000 No | 54.5 1000 No | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 93.14 1000 No | 101.78 1000 No | 8.63 1000 No | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 93.38 1000 No | 80.38 1000 No | 13 1000 No | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value, Eswatini or Mauritius?
- Eswatini, at 96.24 1000 No against 90.69 1000 No in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value between Eswatini and Mauritius?
- 5.55 1000 No, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mauritius?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Mauritius rank globally for fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value?
- Eswatini ranks 116th and Mauritius ranks 117th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.