Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value

Ecuador
4,379 1000 No
in 2023
Zimbabwe
4,103 1000 No
in 2023
Ecuador rank
34th
Zimbabwe rank
36th

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k200020112023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 4,379 1000 No against 4,103 1000 No in Zimbabwe, a difference of 276 1000 No.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Ecuador ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 36th of 145 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 2,940 1000 No 3,105 1000 No 164.96 1000 No Zimbabwe
2010s 3,528 1000 No 3,707 1000 No 179.2 1000 No Zimbabwe
2020s 4,330 1000 No 3,839 1000 No 490.57 1000 No Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Ecuador, at 4,379 1000 No against 4,103 1000 No in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
276 1000 No, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value?
Ecuador ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 36th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-value/ecuador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-value/ecuador/zimbabwe/">Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 4,476 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.