Congo vs Georgia: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value

Congo
825.87 1000 No
in 2023
Georgia
801.55 1000 No
in 2023
Congo rank
72nd
Georgia rank
73rd

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value over time

  • Congo
  • Georgia
4006008001.0k1.2k1.4k200020112023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 825.87 1000 No against 801.55 1000 No in Georgia, a difference of 24.32 1000 No.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.

Congo ranks 72nd and Georgia ranks 73rd of 145 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Georgia Difference Ahead
2000s 515.76 1000 No 1,244 1000 No 728.58 1000 No Georgia
2010s 639.66 1000 No 999.7 1000 No 360.04 1000 No Georgia
2020s 769.29 1000 No 829.61 1000 No 60.32 1000 No Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value, Congo or Georgia?
Congo, at 825.87 1000 No against 801.55 1000 No in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value between Congo and Georgia?
24.32 1000 No, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Georgia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Congo and Georgia rank globally for fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value?
Congo ranks 72nd and Georgia ranks 73rd of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Georgia: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-value/congo-rep/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-value/congo-rep/georgia/">Congo vs Georgia: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 4,476 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.