Botswana vs Lithuania: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value

Botswana
239.52 1000 No
in 2023
Lithuania
223.12 1000 No
in 2023
Botswana rank
106th
Lithuania rank
108th

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value over time

  • Botswana
  • Lithuania
100200300400500200020112023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 239.52 1000 No against 223.12 1000 No in Lithuania, a difference of 16.4 1000 No.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.

Botswana ranks 106th and Lithuania ranks 108th of 145 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 143.33 1000 No 412.75 1000 No 269.42 1000 No Lithuania
2010s 181.64 1000 No 271.63 1000 No 89.99 1000 No Lithuania
2020s 223.22 1000 No 222.71 1000 No 0.5175 1000 No Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value, Botswana or Lithuania?
Botswana, at 239.52 1000 No against 223.12 1000 No in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value between Botswana and Lithuania?
16.4 1000 No, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Lithuania?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Lithuania rank globally for fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value?
Botswana ranks 106th and Lithuania ranks 108th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Lithuania: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-value/botswana/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-value/botswana/lithuania/">Botswana vs Lithuania: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 4,476 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.