Botswana vs Namibia: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value

Botswana
167.16 1000 No
in 2023
Namibia
164.97 1000 No
in 2023
Botswana rank
98th
Namibia rank
100th

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value over time

  • Botswana
  • Namibia
5075100125150175200020112023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 167.16 1000 No against 164.97 1000 No in Namibia, a difference of 2.19 1000 No.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.

Botswana ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 100th of 137 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 95.43 1000 No 113.76 1000 No 18.33 1000 No Namibia
2010s 120.25 1000 No 142.07 1000 No 21.82 1000 No Namibia
2020s 147.76 1000 No 153.84 1000 No 6.08 1000 No Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — male — value, Botswana or Namibia?
Botswana, at 167.16 1000 No against 164.97 1000 No in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — male — value between Botswana and Namibia?
2.19 1000 No, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Namibia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Namibia rank globally for fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — male — value?
Botswana ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 100th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Namibia: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-male-value/botswana/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-male-value/botswana/namibia/">Botswana vs Namibia: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.