Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Finland: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value

Bosnia and Herzegovina
206.45 1000 No
in 2023
Finland
179.19 1000 No
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
93rd
Finland rank
96th

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Finland
0100200300200020112023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 206.45 1000 No against 179.19 1000 No in Finland, a difference of 27.26 1000 No.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Finland ranks 96th of 137 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Finland Difference Ahead
2000s 292.21 1000 No 228.3 1000 No 63.91 1000 No Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 235.32 1000 No 182.81 1000 No 52.5 1000 No Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 205.84 1000 No 178.98 1000 No 26.86 1000 No Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — male — value, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Finland?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 206.45 1000 No against 179.19 1000 No in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — male — value between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Finland?
27.26 1000 No, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Finland?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Finland rank globally for fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — male — value?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Finland ranks 96th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Finland: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-male-value/bosnia-and-herzegovina/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-male-value/bosnia-and-herzegovina/finland/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Finland: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.