Botswana vs North Macedonia: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female

Botswana
72.36 1000 No
in 2023
North Macedonia
54.26 1000 No
in 2023
Botswana rank
105th
North Macedonia rank
108th

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female over time

  • Botswana
  • North Macedonia
20406080100200020112023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 72.36 1000 No against 54.26 1000 No in North Macedonia, a difference of 18.1 1000 No.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.3 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Botswana ranks 105th and North Macedonia ranks 108th of 137 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 47.91 1000 No 82.11 1000 No 34.21 1000 No North Macedonia
2010s 61.39 1000 No 79.31 1000 No 17.91 1000 No North Macedonia
2020s 75.46 1000 No 61.77 1000 No 13.69 1000 No Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — female, Botswana or North Macedonia?
Botswana, at 72.36 1000 No against 54.26 1000 No in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — female between Botswana and North Macedonia?
18.1 1000 No, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and North Macedonia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Botswana and North Macedonia rank globally for fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — female?
Botswana ranks 105th and North Macedonia ranks 108th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs North Macedonia: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-female-value/botswana/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-female-value/botswana/north-macedonia/">Botswana vs North Macedonia: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.