Australia vs Chile: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female

Australia
747.82 1000 No
in 2023
Chile
605.75 1000 No
in 2023
Australia rank
53rd
Chile rank
55th

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female over time

  • Australia
  • Chile
0200400600800200020112023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 747.82 1000 No against 605.75 1000 No in Chile, a difference of 142.07 1000 No.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 53rd and Chile ranks 55th of 137 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Chile Difference Ahead
2000s 734.87 1000 No 503.73 1000 No 231.14 1000 No Australia
2010s 742.21 1000 No 610.35 1000 No 131.86 1000 No Australia
2020s 752.94 1000 No 577.32 1000 No 175.62 1000 No Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — female, Australia or Chile?
Australia, at 747.82 1000 No against 605.75 1000 No in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — female between Australia and Chile?
142.07 1000 No, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chile?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Australia and Chile rank globally for fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — female?
Australia ranks 53rd and Chile ranks 55th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Chile: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-female-value/australia/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-female-value/australia/chile/">Australia vs Chile: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.