United Republic of Tanzania vs Viet Nam: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total

United Republic of Tanzania
15.21 %
in 2023
Viet Nam
12.56 %
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd
Viet Nam rank
5th

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total over time

  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • Viet Nam
510152025200020112023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 15.21 % against 12.56 % in Viet Nam, a difference of 2.65 %.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times Viet Nam's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Viet Nam ahead.

United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd and Viet Nam ranks 5th of 15 countries.

Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Republic of Tanzania Viet Nam Difference Ahead
2000s 8.92 % 15.91 % 6.99 % Viet Nam
2010s 13.55 % 15.64 % 2.09 % Viet Nam
2020s 14.73 % 17 % 2.27 % Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total, United Republic of Tanzania or Viet Nam?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 15.21 % against 12.56 % in Viet Nam as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total between United Republic of Tanzania and Viet Nam?
2.65 %, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and Viet Nam?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do United Republic of Tanzania and Viet Nam rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total?
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd and Viet Nam ranks 5th of 15 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Republic of Tanzania vs Viet Nam: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/united-republic-of-tanzania/viet-nam-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/united-republic-of-tanzania/viet-nam-2/">United Republic of Tanzania vs Viet Nam: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.