European Union (27) vs Papua New Guinea: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total

European Union (27)
8.63 %
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
15.19 %
in 2023
European Union (27) rank
24th
Papua New Guinea rank
22nd

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total over time

  • European Union (27)
  • Papua New Guinea
051015200020112023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 15.19 % against 8.63 % in European Union (27), a difference of 6.56 %.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.8 times European Union (27)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was European Union (27) ahead.

European Union (27) ranks 24th and Papua New Guinea ranks 22nd of 31 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, European Union (27) averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade European Union (27) Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 9.88 % 9.04 % 0.835 % European Union (27)
2010s 8.89 % 11.33 % 2.44 % Papua New Guinea
2020s 8.55 % 14.54 % 5.99 % Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total, European Union (27) or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 15.19 % against 8.63 % in European Union (27) as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total between European Union (27) and Papua New Guinea?
6.56 %, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for European Union (27) and Papua New Guinea?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do European Union (27) and Papua New Guinea rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total?
European Union (27) ranks 24th and Papua New Guinea ranks 22nd of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

European Union (27) vs Papua New Guinea: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/european-union-27/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/european-union-27/papua-new-guinea/">European Union (27) vs Papua New Guinea: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.