Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Oceania: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total

Democratic Republic of the Congo
4.97 %
in 2023
Oceania
10.36 %
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
14th
Oceania rank
17th

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Oceania
2.557.51012.515200020112023

How they compare

Oceania currently reports 10.36 % against 4.97 % in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 5.39 %.

That makes Oceania's figure about 2.1 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Oceania has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 14th and Oceania ranks 17th of 15 countries.

Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Oceania Difference Ahead
2000s 4.22 % 11.85 % 7.63 % Oceania
2010s 4.1 % 11.21 % 7.1 % Oceania
2020s 4.86 % 10.72 % 5.86 % Oceania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Oceania?
Oceania, at 10.36 % against 4.97 % in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Oceania?
5.39 %, with Oceania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Oceania?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Oceania rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 14th and Oceania ranks 17th of 15 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Oceania: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/oceania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/oceania/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Oceania: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.