Belarus vs Portugal: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total

Belarus
10.44 %
in 2023
Portugal
11.05 %
in 2023
Belarus rank
65th
Portugal rank
63rd

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total over time

  • Belarus
  • Portugal
051015200020112023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 11.05 % against 10.44 % in Belarus, a difference of 0.61 %.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 65th and Portugal ranks 63rd of 125 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Portugal Difference Ahead
2000s 12.22 % 13.85 % 1.64 % Portugal
2010s 10.58 % 12.71 % 2.13 % Portugal
2020s 10.22 % 11.41 % 1.19 % Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total, Belarus or Portugal?
Portugal, at 11.05 % against 10.44 % in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total between Belarus and Portugal?
0.61 %, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Portugal?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Portugal rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total?
Belarus ranks 65th and Portugal ranks 63rd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Portugal: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/belarus/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/belarus/portugal/">Belarus vs Portugal: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.