Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total

Melanesia
23.43 %
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
17.49 %
in 2023
Melanesia rank
2nd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
5th

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total over time

  • Melanesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0102030200020112023

How they compare

Melanesia currently reports 23.43 % against 17.49 % in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 5.94 %.

That makes Melanesia's figure about 1.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Melanesia ahead.

Melanesia ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 15 countries.

Melanesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Melanesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 14.44 % 9.78 % 4.66 % Melanesia
2010s 18.63 % 12.89 % 5.74 % Melanesia
2020s 24.95 % 17.84 % 7.11 % Melanesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total, Melanesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Melanesia, at 23.43 % against 17.49 % in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total between Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
5.94 %, with Melanesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total?
Melanesia ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 15 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-female-value/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-female-value/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.