Mali vs Papua New Guinea: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total over time
- Mali
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 29.16 % against 26.17 % in Mali, a difference of 2.99 %.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Mali ranks 19th and Papua New Guinea ranks 17th of 125 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.36 % | 16.51 % | 0.157 % | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 23.28 % | 21.03 % | 2.25 % | Mali |
| 2020s | 25.16 % | 29.55 % | 4.4 % | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total, Mali or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 29.16 % against 26.17 % in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total between Mali and Papua New Guinea?
- 2.99 %, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Papua New Guinea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Papua New Guinea rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total?
- Mali ranks 19th and Papua New Guinea ranks 17th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.