Cabo Verde vs United States of America: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total

Cabo Verde
9.93 %
in 2023
United States of America
10.6 %
in 2023
Cabo Verde rank
26th
United States of America rank
23rd

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • United States of America
051015200020112023

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 10.6 % against 9.93 % in Cabo Verde, a difference of 0.67 %.

That makes United States of America's figure about 1.1 times Cabo Verde's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cabo Verde ahead.

Cabo Verde ranks 26th and United States of America ranks 23rd of 31 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 2 and United States of America in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde United States of America Difference Ahead
2000s 13.03 % 10.92 % 2.11 % Cabo Verde
2010s 11.98 % 11.24 % 0.742 % Cabo Verde
2020s 10 % 10.26 % 0.2625 % United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total, Cabo Verde or United States of America?
United States of America, at 10.6 % against 9.93 % in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total between Cabo Verde and United States of America?
0.67 %, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and United States of America?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Cabo Verde and United States of America rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total?
Cabo Verde ranks 26th and United States of America ranks 23rd of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs United States of America: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-female-value/cabo-verde-2/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-female-value/cabo-verde-2/united-states-of-america/">Cabo Verde vs United States of America: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.