Australia and New Zealand vs Georgia: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total

Australia and New Zealand
12.23 %
in 2023
Georgia
12.17 %
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
75th
Georgia rank
77th

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Georgia
05101520200020112023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 12.23 % against 12.17 % in Georgia, a difference of 0.06 %.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 75th and Georgia ranks 77th of 125 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Georgia Difference Ahead
2000s 16.42 % 8.75 % 7.67 % Australia and New Zealand
2010s 14.06 % 10.97 % 3.09 % Australia and New Zealand
2020s 12.74 % 11.71 % 1.03 % Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total, Australia and New Zealand or Georgia?
Australia and New Zealand, at 12.23 % against 12.17 % in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total between Australia and New Zealand and Georgia?
0.06 %, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Georgia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Georgia rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 75th and Georgia ranks 77th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Georgia: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-female-value/australia-and-new-zealand/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-female-value/australia-and-new-zealand/georgia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Georgia: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.