Australia and New Zealand vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 80.08 % against 14.2 % in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 65.88 %.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 5.6 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 14th of 137 countries.
Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.53 % | 9.45 % | 65.09 % | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | 78.42 % | 12.08 % | 66.34 % | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 78.99 % | 14.2 % | 64.8 % | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs, Australia and New Zealand or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 80.08 % against 14.2 % in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs between Australia and New Zealand and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 65.88 %, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 14th of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.