Papua New Guinea vs Sudan: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Sudan
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 29.58 % against 29.06 % in Sudan, a difference of 0.52 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sudan ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 89th and Sudan ranks 91st of 125 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.22 % | 31.53 % | 10.31 % | Sudan |
| 2010s | 26.02 % | 32.65 % | 6.63 % | Sudan |
| 2020s | 29.11 % | 29.76 % | 0.6567 % | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs, Papua New Guinea or Sudan?
- Papua New Guinea, at 29.58 % against 29.06 % in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs between Papua New Guinea and Sudan?
- 0.52 %, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Sudan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Sudan rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 89th and Sudan ranks 91st of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.