Lebanon vs Oceania: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS over time
- Lebanon
- Oceania
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 74.39 % against 51.54 % in Oceania, a difference of 22.85 %.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.4 times Oceania's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Lebanon ranks 13th and Oceania ranks 10th of 125 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.16 % | 53.55 % | 17.61 % | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 75.17 % | 53.99 % | 21.18 % | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 74.45 % | 51.93 % | 22.52 % | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs, Lebanon or Oceania?
- Lebanon, at 74.39 % against 51.54 % in Oceania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs between Lebanon and Oceania?
- 22.85 %, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Oceania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Lebanon and Oceania rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
- Lebanon ranks 13th and Oceania ranks 10th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.