Georgia vs Rwanda: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS

Georgia
25.89 %
in 2023
Rwanda
25.62 %
in 2023
Georgia rank
95th
Rwanda rank
96th

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS over time

  • Georgia
  • Rwanda
0102030200020112023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 25.89 % against 25.62 % in Rwanda, a difference of 0.27 %.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 95th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 125 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 18.31 % 15.95 % 2.36 % Georgia
2010s 22.62 % 21.88 % 0.739 % Georgia
2020s 24.89 % 22.42 % 2.46 % Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs, Georgia or Rwanda?
Georgia, at 25.89 % against 25.62 % in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs between Georgia and Rwanda?
0.27 %, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Rwanda?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Rwanda rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
Georgia ranks 95th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Rwanda: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/georgia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/georgia/rwanda/">Georgia vs Rwanda: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.