Cyprus vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS

Cyprus
73.97 %
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
8.88 %
in 2023
Cyprus rank
14th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
14th

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS over time

  • Cyprus
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
020406080200020112023

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 73.97 % against 8.88 % in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 65.09 %.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 8.3 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 14th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 14th of 125 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 73.38 % 6.05 % 67.33 % Cyprus
2010s 73.42 % 7.13 % 66.29 % Cyprus
2020s 73.1 % 8.53 % 64.58 % Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs, Cyprus or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Cyprus, at 73.97 % against 8.88 % in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs between Cyprus and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
65.09 %, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
Cyprus ranks 14th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 14th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/cyprus/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/cyprus/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Cyprus vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.