Chile vs South Africa: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS

Chile
59.12 %
in 2023
South Africa
58.73 %
in 2023
Chile rank
38th
South Africa rank
40th

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS over time

  • Chile
  • South Africa
0204060200020112023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 59.12 % against 58.73 % in South Africa, a difference of 0.39 %.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was South Africa ahead.

Chile ranks 38th and South Africa ranks 40th of 125 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 50.26 % 57.26 % 7 % South Africa
2010s 56.22 % 62.26 % 6.03 % South Africa
2020s 57.75 % 58.13 % 0.38 % South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs, Chile or South Africa?
Chile, at 59.12 % against 58.73 % in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs between Chile and South Africa?
0.39 %, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Africa?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Chile and South Africa rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
Chile ranks 38th and South Africa ranks 40th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs South Africa: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/chile/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/chile/south-africa/">Chile vs South Africa: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.