Belgium vs Canada: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS

Belgium
86.49 %
in 2023
Canada
89.48 %
in 2023
Belgium rank
3rd
Canada rank
1st

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS over time

  • Belgium
  • Canada
020406080200020112023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 89.48 % against 86.49 % in Belgium, a difference of 2.99 %.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Canada ahead.

Belgium ranks 3rd and Canada ranks 1st of 125 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Canada Difference Ahead
2000s 82.78 % 84.46 % 1.69 % Canada
2010s 85.68 % 86.84 % 1.16 % Canada
2020s 86.09 % 88.45 % 2.36 % Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs, Belgium or Canada?
Canada, at 89.48 % against 86.49 % in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs between Belgium and Canada?
2.99 %, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Canada?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Canada rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
Belgium ranks 3rd and Canada ranks 1st of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Canada: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/belgium/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/belgium/canada/">Belgium vs Canada: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.