Samoa vs Thailand: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS over time
- Samoa
- Thailand
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 52.25 % against 50.7 % in Thailand, a difference of 1.55 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Thailand ahead.
Samoa ranks 74th and Thailand ranks 76th of 125 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.52 % | 45.51 % | 11 % | Thailand |
| 2020s | 47.6 % | 49.23 % | 1.63 % | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs, Samoa or Thailand?
- Samoa, at 52.25 % against 50.7 % in Thailand as of 2022.
- What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs between Samoa and Thailand?
- 1.55 %, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Thailand?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Samoa and Thailand rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
- Samoa ranks 74th and Thailand ranks 76th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.