Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cambodia: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS

Bosnia and Herzegovina
45 %
in 2023
Cambodia
39.91 %
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
85th
Cambodia rank
88th

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Cambodia
20304050200020112023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 45 % against 39.91 % in Cambodia, a difference of 5.09 %.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 85th and Cambodia ranks 88th of 125 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Cambodia Difference Ahead
2000s 46.44 % 23.98 % 22.46 % Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 47.94 % 31.07 % 16.87 % Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 47.12 % 37.61 % 9.51 % Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Cambodia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 45 % against 39.91 % in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia?
5.09 %, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 85th and Cambodia ranks 88th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cambodia: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/bosnia-and-herzegovina/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/bosnia-and-herzegovina/cambodia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cambodia: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.