Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: FAO Model — Share of females in total AFS employment — Female — Value

Australia
43.84 %
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand
44.22 %
in 2023
Australia rank
51st
Australia and New Zealand rank
48th

FAO Model — Share of females in total AFS employment — Female — Value over time

  • Australia
  • Australia and New Zealand
01020304050200020112023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 44.22 % against 43.84 % in Australia, a difference of 0.38 %.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 51st and Australia and New Zealand ranks 48th of 137 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Australia and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 42.98 % 42.7 % 0.278 % Australia
2010s 43.35 % 43.03 % 0.323 % Australia
2020s 44.29 % 44.33 % 0.0375 % Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of females in total afs employment — female — value, Australia or Australia and New Zealand?
Australia and New Zealand, at 44.22 % against 43.84 % in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of females in total afs employment — female — value between Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
0.38 %, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Australia and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for fao model — share of females in total afs employment — female — value?
Australia ranks 51st and Australia and New Zealand ranks 48th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of females in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: FAO Model — Share of females in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-females-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-females-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/">Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: FAO Model — Share of females in total AFS employment — Female — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of females in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.