Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Papua New Guinea: FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment

Democratic Republic of the Congo
50.14 %
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
63.7 %
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
11th
Papua New Guinea rank
12th

FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Papua New Guinea
0204060200020112023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 63.7 % against 50.14 % in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 13.56 %.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 11th and Papua New Guinea ranks 12th of 15 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 49.36 % 63 % 13.64 % Papua New Guinea
2010s 48.18 % 62.98 % 14.81 % Papua New Guinea
2020s 49.76 % 63.51 % 13.75 % Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of females in non-agricultural afs employment, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 63.7 % against 50.14 % in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of females in non-agricultural afs employment between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Papua New Guinea?
13.56 %, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Papua New Guinea?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Papua New Guinea rank globally for fao model — share of females in non-agricultural afs employment?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 11th and Papua New Guinea ranks 12th of 15 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Papua New Guinea: FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-females-in-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-females-in-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/papua-new-guinea/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Papua New Guinea: FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.