Congo vs Uruguay: FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment
FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment over time
- Congo
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 38.6 % against 37.55 % in Congo, a difference of 1.05 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 105th and Uruguay ranks 104th of 125 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.57 % | 30.86 % | 7.7 % | Congo |
| 2010s | 37.98 % | 34.99 % | 2.98 % | Congo |
| 2020s | 37.31 % | 37.49 % | 0.175 % | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao model — share of females in non-agricultural afs employment, Congo or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 38.6 % against 37.55 % in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao model — share of females in non-agricultural afs employment between Congo and Uruguay?
- 1.05 %, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uruguay?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Uruguay rank globally for fao model — share of females in non-agricultural afs employment?
- Congo ranks 105th and Uruguay ranks 104th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.