Latvia vs Mauritius: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment

Latvia
33.82 %
in 2023
Mauritius
33.68 %
in 2023
Latvia rank
103rd
Mauritius rank
104th

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment over time

  • Latvia
  • Mauritius
01020304050200020112023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 33.82 % against 33.68 % in Mauritius, a difference of 0.14 %.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mauritius ahead.

Latvia ranks 103rd and Mauritius ranks 104th of 145 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 42.16 % 39.24 % 2.92 % Latvia
2010s 36.84 % 38.64 % 1.8 % Mauritius
2020s 35.9 % 36.93 % 1.03 % Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment, Latvia or Mauritius?
Latvia, at 33.82 % against 33.68 % in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment between Latvia and Mauritius?
0.14 %, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
Latvia ranks 103rd and Mauritius ranks 104th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Mauritius: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-value/latvia/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-value/latvia/mauritius/">Latvia vs Mauritius: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 4,451 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.