Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Puerto Rico: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
100 %
in 2023
Puerto Rico
100 %
in 2023
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
1st
Puerto Rico rank
1st

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment over time

  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Puerto Rico
020406080100200020112023

How they compare

Democratic People's Republic of Korea currently reports 100 % against 100 % in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 %.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 1st and Puerto Rico ranks 1st of 17 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic People's Republic of Korea Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
2000s 100 % 100 % 0 %
2010s 100 % 100 % 0 %
2020s 100 % 100 % 0 %

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment, Democratic People's Republic of Korea or Puerto Rico?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea, at 100 % against 100 % in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment between Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Puerto Rico?
0 %, with Democratic People's Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Puerto Rico?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Puerto Rico rank globally for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 1st and Puerto Rico ranks 1st of 17 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Puerto Rico: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/puerto-rico-us/">Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Puerto Rico: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,347 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.